Harmate creates a mirror above two simple questionnaires: each side keeps its questions, participants or personae, while A/B pairs structure the matching.
Mirror Link
One question from questionnaire A
The matching question from questionnaire B
Two child questionnaires, one orchestration mirror. A/B pairs, side-specific questions and explicit weights. Simulation and A/B cockpit to check readiness on each side.
The Risk
Two questionnaires can collect good signals without saying which A answer should be compared with which B answer. The matching then becomes hard to review.
The mirror starts by linking axes before scoring.
Some axes should bring similar profiles together. Others should favor complementarity. The weight makes that intent explicit.
The matching rule becomes reviewable, not implicit.
Participants, personae and simulated results remain accessible on side A and side B. The A/B cockpit checks both flows before deeper analysis.
The mirror orchestrates without erasing the two child workflows.Mentors / Mentees. When available expertise, learning goals, availability and autonomy level need to be connected.
Recruiters / Candidates. When the role, manager and candidate need to be compared through explicit criteria rather than a broad impression.
Project Teams / Clients. When a team needs to connect internal constraints, client expectations, success criteria and complementarity zones.
Organizers / Participants. When groups, workshops or pairs need to account for goals, preferences and logistical limits at the same time.
Mirror Link
One question from questionnaire A
Mirror linkThe matching question from questionnaire B
What answer A measures
Shared criterionWhat answer B measures
Matching can look for close profiles
Readable ruleor complementary profiles
Mirror Link
Name the mirror, the context, then the A and B audiences that should be compared or matched.
Each axis becomes one A question and one B question. Harmate can suggest the opposite wording when a question is stable.
Make weights, strategy, capacities and exclusivity rules explicit so the result can be explained.
A/B participants or personae follow their dedicated flows, with simulated results available side by side.
The mirror view checks readiness on both sides and opens detailed results without blending child workflows.
The Risk
A team wants to create useful pairs while accounting for skills, goals, constraints and availability.
Mentor side: which skills can you pass on? Mentee side: which skills do you want to develop?
Skills and goals get a positive weight; some constraints or experiences can create the desired complementarity.
The cockpit checks that both sides are ready, then detailed results help review assumptions before matching.
How the mirror links two questionnaires
Each audience answers its own questionnaire. The mirror does not merge the forms: it keeps the A/B separation and makes question links explicit.
For each link, the team knows whether the criterion should bring similar profiles together or seek complementarity. Scoring does not become a black box.
Personae, simulated participants and the A/B cockpit let the team check each side before real collection.
No. A Harmate mirror questionnaire orchestrates two simple questionnaires, A and B. Each side keeps its own questions, participants or personae, while the mirror stores shared mappings and settings.
No. It can compare two viewpoints, but the product mechanism is broader: connect two populations, align A/B questions, weight criteria and prepare usable matching.
A positive weight favors similarity between A and B. A negative weight favors complementarity or heterogeneity. Its magnitude shows how much the axis matters in matching.
No. The mirror simulation view summarizes A/B readiness and opens each side’s workflows. Detailed analyses remain handled by the child questionnaires.
Yes. Simulation mode lets you test sides A and B with personae, adjust mirror wording and check the A/B cockpit before real collection.
Mirror Questionnaires