Structure Feedback and Quality Evidence
A shared framework to create the right questionnaires, centralize answers, share summaries and retrieve the elements needed for quality follow-up.
When every session produces its own records
As sessions, trainers and formats multiply, the real risk is losing comparability: feedback that is hard to read, scattered evidence and quality actions that come too late.
Questionnaires That Vary Too Much
Each trainer starts from a different format; answers become hard to compare across sessions or programs.
Underused Learner Feedback
Comments exist, but they too often stay in exports or files no one has time to review.
Quality Actions Hard to Link
It becomes difficult to show which signal triggered which pedagogical adjustment or follow-up action.
Qualiopi Evidence That Takes Too Long to Consolidate
The quality team has to retrieve questionnaires, answers, feedback and follow-up actions when those elements should already be organized.
Example: Align Questionnaires Without Overloading the Quality Team
Approved base
The pedagogical team prepares a shared template for placement, evaluation or satisfaction.
Local adaptation
Each trainer adjusts a few questions to the context without losing the criteria that make feedback comparable.
Session summary
Open answers are grouped into themes, with verbatims available to review what matters.
Quality follow-up ready
The team retrieves the questionnaire, answers, feedback and decided actions without rebuilding the file by hand.
A Shared Framework for Pedagogy and Quality
Harmate connects questionnaire templates, answers, summaries and exports so each role works from a readable base.
Shared Templates
Prepare shared bases for placement, evaluation and satisfaction, then adapt them to the context.
Reading Feedback
Identify recurring themes, weak signals, irritants and expectations that deserve action.
Exports and Records
Keep useful elements: questionnaire, answers, summaries, feedback and tracked actions.
Better Prepared Groups
Help trainers compose groups based on visible levels, goals or constraints.
Key Needs Covered by One Shared Framework
The same answers can help prepare groups, track satisfaction, support trainers and document quality.
Learner Heterogeneity
Identify levels, expectations and constraints before the session to help trainers adapt their facilitation.
- Shared placement questionnaires
- Explicit group criteria
- Group summaries for trainers
- Pedagogical adaptation cues
Satisfaction and Perceived Value
Collect useful feedback to show what worked, what should evolve and what learners retained.
- Available Evaluations and Feedback
- Review of Observed Differences
- Summaries shareable with clients
- Feedback consolidated by session
Trainer Onboarding
Help new trainers understand your practices, templates and expected records from their first sessions.
- Direct access to approved templates
- Shared usage guidance
- Fast autonomy on questionnaires
- Quality records from the first session
A Method Readable by Pedagogy and Quality Teams
Harmate keeps criteria, answers and exports understandable without promising automatic compliance.
Prepared Quality Framework
Questionnaires can produce useful elements for the quality file, but compliance remains managed by your organization.
Reviewable Field Feedback
Themes do not erase verbatims: original answers remain available to verify interpretation.
Role-Based Views
Pedagogical leadership, trainers and quality teams can review information according to their responsibilities.
Frequent Organization Questions
Who are the main partners?
Structure Your Questionnaires and Quality Evidence
See how Harmate can give your teams a shared framework without adding work for trainers.