Does Harmate decide instead of HR?
No. Harmate helps clarify criteria, organize answers and prepare a discussion. The decision remains owned by HR, managers and the relevant stakeholders.
Business needs, open answers and team feedback: Harmate turns them into questionnaires, summaries and action points HR and managers can both understand.

The issue is not collecting more data. It is connecting the right signals to the right context so you can decide, explain and follow up.
Manager expectations, field constraints and truly decisive criteria remain implicit for too long.
Between interview notes, messages, surveys and meetings, signals exist but are not reviewed together.
When criteria change or remain unclear, decisions become fragile for managers and employees alike.
People know why a decision was made, but not always which points to watch in the following weeks.
HR and the manager formulate the context, priorities, team constraints and criteria that should not be mixed.
Questions collect useful answers without turning the person or team into an opaque score.
Harmate organizes answers, themes and watch points to prepare a clear discussion with stakeholders.
The decision leads to concrete reference points for onboarding, management, internal mobility or team composition.
Harmate helps move from a still-fuzzy need to discussable criteria, useful questions and a shareable summary.
The assistant helps formulate context, responsibilities, constraints and points to validate with the manager.
Criteria become visible: essential, discussable, to verify or to follow after the decision.
Questions are tied to selected criteria so answers can be compared without locking people into a cold grid.
Topics to share, validate or follow are visible before the decision turns into an operational problem.

Harmate is useful when a human decision must be clarified, shared and followed up: business need, onboarding, project teams or internal listening.

Frame the need with the manager, separate essential criteria and produce a clearer job description base.

Turn collected answers and signals into concrete reference points for the first weeks.

Compose work groups while considering useful constraints, preferences, skills and complementarities.

Collect qualitative feedback, identify what comes up often and prioritize topics to address with managers.
Harmate organizes answers and makes criteria visible. The decision remains human, reasoned and reviewable.
Each summary should be traceable back to criteria defined with HR and the manager.
Summaries do not replace verbatims: original answers remain necessary to verify interpretation.
The assistant helps structure job descriptions, questionnaires and summaries, but criteria remain validated by your team.
No. Harmate helps clarify criteria, organize answers and prepare a discussion. The decision remains owned by HR, managers and the relevant stakeholders.
No. Hiring is one use case, but the same logic also helps frame needs, onboarding, internal mobility, project teams and team listening.
By keeping open questions, readable criteria and verbatims available. The summary helps review, it does not replace human conversation.
A short summary, selected criteria, points to validate, watch signals and the verbatims needed to understand the decision.
Create a job description, prepare a questionnaire or structure a summary with visible criteria.