RACI Matrix: How to Clarify "Who Does What" Without Building a Bureaucratic Monster

It is the most common cause of delay in projects: the Role Blur.

"I thought you were handling the validation."

"No, I was just in the loop, I thought Mark was deciding."

To solve this confusion around roles and responsibilities, organizations rush to a classic tool: the RACI Matrix (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed).

On paper, it’s perfect. It maps every task to a role. But in reality, the RACI often becomes an administrative nightmare—a giant Excel file that everyone fills out to "cover themselves," but no one uses to drive the project.

Instead of clarifying, a bad RACI creates paralysis: too many people to consult, no clear decision-maker, and everyone drowned in emails.

Here is how to clean up your matrix and turn it back into what it should be: a tool for speed.

1. The Definitions (And Where It Goes Wrong)

Before fixing it, let’s recall the code. A RACI defines four levels of involvement:

• R - Responsible: The Doer. The one who actually works on the task.

• A - Accountable: The Owner. The one who has the final say and signs off (and takes the heat if it fails).

• C - Consulted: The Expert. Must be heard before the decision (two-way communication).

• I - Informed: The Spectator. Needs to know the result after the fact (one-way communication).

The Crash Point: Most teams confuse R and A. They put A's everywhere to make people feel important, or they put multiple A's to dilute responsibility.

2. The 3 Golden Rules of an Agile RACI

If your project is stuck, check your matrix against these three rules. Break them and you manufacture bureaucracy.

Rule #1: Only One "A" Per Line

This is non-negotiable. If two people are Accountable, no one decides.

If a line has multiple A's, it means the task is too broad. Break it down into sub-tasks until there is only one owner per line.

Rule #2: Minimize the "C" (Consulted)

The "C" is the most expensive letter in the alphabet. Every "C" you add is a meeting, an email thread, or a validation loop.

Don't give a "C" just to be nice or political. Only give it if the person holds specific expertise without which the project will fail.

Rule #3: "I" Is Not a Cc: All

The "Informed" column is not a mailing list. It signifies that the person needs the output of the task to start their own work.

Using "I" to "keep everyone in the loop" creates cognitive noise. Use a public dashboard instead.

3. From Static RACI to Dynamic Staffing (Skills + Availability)

The other major flaw of the RACI is that it relies on Job Titles, not People.

It says: "The Product Designer (R) creates the prototype."

But in a real company, you might have five Product Designers. Which one is available? Which one has the specific expertise for this mobile prototype? Which one wants to learn this skill?

That’s where most plans fail: the chart is clear, but the staffing isn’t.

A static RACI is a theoretical map. To make it operational, you need Dynamic Matching.

How to bridge the gap:

1. Define the Role (RACI): "We need a Developer (R) for this sprint."

2. Match the Person (Staffing): Use data (skills + availability + affinity) to find which developer is the best fit right now.

Conclusion

The RACI is not a legal document to protect you when things go wrong. It is a routing protocol to make information flow fast.

If your matrix takes more than 10 minutes to read, it's useless.

Clean up the lines. Remove the excess "C"s. Ensure every task has a single "A". And then, focus on the people who will bring those letters to life.